Evaluative processes of occupational therapists in stroke rehabilitation facilities

Authors

  • Deborah Apollon-Roy Ergothérapeute, MSc, Centre d’hébergement Armand-Lavergne, programmes de réadaptation fonctionnelle intensive et de soins post-aigus, CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Canada
  • Carole Miéville Réseau provincial de recherche en adaptation-réadaptation (REPAR), CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de- Montréal, Canada
  • Lise Poissant Ergothérapeute, PhD, chercheuse, Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4925-6352

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13096/rfre.v7n2.194

Keywords:

Outils d’évaluation, AVC, Réadaptation, Meilleures pratiques, Evaluation tools, Stroke, Rehabilitation, Best practices

Abstract

Introduction : Stroke impacts the well-being, the activities and the social participation of stroke survivors. Despite the known benefits of rehabilitation and well documented stroke recommendations, systematic application of best practices remains low. In fact, little is known on the type of rehabilitation services that are offered in Quebec. Thereby, the objective of this study was to describe the utilization of evaluation tools by occupational therapists (OTs) working in a rehabilitation facility in Quebec and to characterize the gaps between the utilization of tools and the Canadian Stroke Best Practices.

Méthods : This is a secondary analysis of the data obtained from a provincial audit of 735 charts of stroke patients who received rehabilitation services on a in- or out-patient facility. The frequency of; clinical problems as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); evaluation processes and; evaluation tools used by OTs were estimated. Chi-Square tests were calculated to compare in-patient and out-patient results.

Results : A total of 46  tools were used by OTs while only 22 of those met the best practices. The most frequently ICF domains evaluated by OTs were associated to the motor, cognitive, and visuo-perceptual functions as well as driving, daily and instrumental activities. Overall, OTs working in in-patient facilities used more tools than those working in out-patient facilities.

Conclusion : Despite gaps between OTs practice and best practices, clinical problems of patients are evaluated. Future studies are necessary to understand the factors justifying those gaps. 

Author Biographies

Deborah Apollon-Roy, Ergothérapeute, MSc, Centre d’hébergement Armand-Lavergne, programmes de réadaptation fonctionnelle intensive et de soins post-aigus, CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Canada

 

     

Lise Poissant, Ergothérapeute, PhD, chercheuse, Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-Sud-de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Canada

 

     

Published

2021-12-16

How to Cite

Apollon-Roy, D., Miéville, C., & Poissant, L. (2021). Evaluative processes of occupational therapists in stroke rehabilitation facilities. Revue Francophone De Recherche En Ergothérapie, 7(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.13096/rfre.v7n2.194

Issue

Section

Research article